Comment by asenna
1 day ago
Ok I scrambled to finalize a name for it and create a new repo for it - https://github.com/Simbastack-hq/framedex
PS - I just put this together in the last few mins, removed my personal files and references. So it's not tested properly, please let me know if any issues.
It's still an early hack, but I have thousands of still images as well from my camera which I've not processed and I need to do the same analysis for those.
So I'll continue working on it, but happy to receive any PRs if anyone finds any use for it.
I'm tired of having a backlog of thousands of images and videos, leaving it for later.
Hey friend, try something in this ballpark, your post has a bunch of painful AI tropes:
https://github.com/blader/humanizer
You get a pass here because you're doing really cool stuff but it's kinda tough to read past the AI nonsense, and it's relatively easy to screen out "it's not x it's y" kind of things and the bolded bullet points.
I don't dislike those tropes because they are frequent or because they are not pleasing to read intrinsically. I dislike them because it tells me it was made by AI and AI output varies strongly in quality and most of it is low on insight but rings the right bells to make it seem insightful. It indicates a lack of human care.
Hiding these clues by another AI pass doesn't solve the core problem. Now you just end up with content that camouflaged better but is still equally low in nutritional value.
it’s a different story.
I was highly interested in reading this article from start to finish.
Ofc there are was a lot of slop moments, but author experience itself is great!
And i genuinely don’t care if he would share it through LLM article.
Just please remove slop markers :)
I feel like human copywriters have been using those same tricks for clickbait articles for years…
3 replies →
I dislike them because I find they generally don’t give any useful information OR if the information is in fact useful, it could do it with a fraction of the words.
Vigorous writing is concise.
As someone that naturally used a rule of 3 and em dashes I hate AI for taking that away from me.
Agreed, I find myself avoiding constructs I would use naturally because they read as AI - "not just because other people would judge them, but because I also notice and dislike them".
Thanks for this! This is exactly what I was looking for.
Tbh, I have a lot of thoughts and ideas and things to share and I do spend time and effort trying to de-AI-ing it but this should help a lot.
I'll try it out.
In fact, I was expecting getting shit on by HN readers for this but was pleasantly surprised that readers moved past it.
Yeah I think you'll find these days that there's a lot of respect for substance like what you're doing, even past the noise of the AI. I also use a lot of AI but you really have to demand quality from it, whether it's writing, media, or code. It's clear you've got the taste from your media work, and we're all still learning as we go, so I'm very glad that I could point you in that direction.
7 replies →
if you care for some feedback about the writing, dropping the link and saying "PR's are open!" would land probably equal or better, and would reduce noise on the message. as sibling said, substance and noise
2 replies →
They haven't: this is the top thread, and the entire threads is saying its unreadable and explaining step by step how to do the basics you should have done before you posted. I'm not sure why you're pleasantly surprised, I would have expected embarrassed, and taken down the HN post to get at least the basics down before sharing it under my name (if possible, dunno how HN submissions work)
2 replies →
This diminishes the llm performance by making it use random out of band non thinking tokens
Btw I like your article, it does feel a bit AI generated but I think the problem and setting are interesting enough that it was a pleasant read.