Comment by neals 1 day ago It's good to have some options, to prevent the ecosystem from stalling 5 comments neals Reply appplication 1 day ago I agree philosophically, but the JavaScript ecosystem has never been languishing for lack of options. If anything, excessive fragmentation is a real concern. arikrahman 18 hours ago I agree that frameworks are abundant but there are not that many JS engine alternatives. pjmlp 16 hours ago It has been raining JS engines since Netscape Application Server, alone on Wikipedia there are 22 listed. 1 reply → neals 1 day ago Interesting, I'm not aware of that many nodejs alternatives...
appplication 1 day ago I agree philosophically, but the JavaScript ecosystem has never been languishing for lack of options. If anything, excessive fragmentation is a real concern. arikrahman 18 hours ago I agree that frameworks are abundant but there are not that many JS engine alternatives. pjmlp 16 hours ago It has been raining JS engines since Netscape Application Server, alone on Wikipedia there are 22 listed. 1 reply → neals 1 day ago Interesting, I'm not aware of that many nodejs alternatives...
arikrahman 18 hours ago I agree that frameworks are abundant but there are not that many JS engine alternatives. pjmlp 16 hours ago It has been raining JS engines since Netscape Application Server, alone on Wikipedia there are 22 listed. 1 reply →
pjmlp 16 hours ago It has been raining JS engines since Netscape Application Server, alone on Wikipedia there are 22 listed. 1 reply →
I agree philosophically, but the JavaScript ecosystem has never been languishing for lack of options. If anything, excessive fragmentation is a real concern.
I agree that frameworks are abundant but there are not that many JS engine alternatives.
It has been raining JS engines since Netscape Application Server, alone on Wikipedia there are 22 listed.
1 reply →
Interesting, I'm not aware of that many nodejs alternatives...