Comment by DeathArrow 7 hours ago After reading the article I am not sure what crime did they commit in the Netherlands. 7 comments DeathArrow Reply msh 7 hours ago The article spells it out clearly: charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities. htx80nerd 2 hours ago >"making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities."this is very vague bunbun69 7 hours ago I feel like you’re only asking this because you disagree with their charges, not because you genuinely have no clue why they’re arrested. binaryturtle 7 hours ago > …charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities…I guess that's why. SecretDreams 7 hours ago > charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities.Did you read this part? DonHopkins 7 hours ago [flagged]
msh 7 hours ago The article spells it out clearly: charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities. htx80nerd 2 hours ago >"making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities."this is very vague
htx80nerd 2 hours ago >"making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities."this is very vague
bunbun69 7 hours ago I feel like you’re only asking this because you disagree with their charges, not because you genuinely have no clue why they’re arrested.
binaryturtle 7 hours ago > …charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities…I guess that's why.
SecretDreams 7 hours ago > charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities.Did you read this part?
The article spells it out clearly: charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities.
>"making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities."
this is very vague
I feel like you’re only asking this because you disagree with their charges, not because you genuinely have no clue why they’re arrested.
> …charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities…
I guess that's why.
> charging them with violating sanctions law by directly or indirectly making economic resources available to EU-sanctioned entities.
Did you read this part?
[flagged]