Comment by UqWBcuFx6NV4r
17 hours ago
It’ll be a run-on effect of whatever framework they are using, and they very justifiably don’t want to bother catering to you. Having JS disabled in 2026 and complaining about sites not behaving is simply a performative act.
2015: It's a SPA blog because my employer forced me to do it that way, I didn't want it.
2026: It's a SPA blog because I very justifiably don't want to bother catering to you. Having JS disabled in 2026 and complaining about sites not behaving is simply a performative act.
>and they very justifiably don’t want to bother catering to you
Considering they are one of the very few sites and VPNs that allow sign up without JS your claim is verifiably false. They also collaborate with and develop there own tor browser fork which has the highest rate of non JS user.
It’s basic self defense. Who runs around the web in 2026 allowing random JS? Might as well be licking seats on the subway.
> Who runs around the web in 2026 allowing random JS?
Within a rounding error, 100% of people on the internet.
If you trust your browser it's fine, and if you don't then both CSS and SVG are significantly more risky.
This isn't true at all.
Anything SVG does maliciously, it does by containing JavaScript, so SVG's worst case is a subset of JS's.
Remind me again what the ratio of browser sandbox escapes coupled with full RCE is between JS, CSS, and SVG?
> then both CSS and SVG are significantly more risky.
how???
[flagged]