Comment by jjgreen 4 days ago I laugh at your spying attempts from my HD-equipped laptop, ... 5 comments jjgreen Reply progval 10 hours ago The paper (https://hannesweissteiner.com/pdfs/frost.pdf) cites two earlier papers (from 2014 and 2017) that did the same for HDDs. tosti 3 hours ago I laugh at your spying attempts from my cURL e-mail service that I use instead of a web browser. gblargg 5 hours ago Or mine where the entire browser profile is on a ramdisk. lima 5 hours ago Higher IO latencies in HDs might actually make this attack easier - more contention means more bits of data. falsaberN1 21 hours ago I got $HOME in a huge HDD because it was cheaper. I guess we belong to the cool kids club now?
progval 10 hours ago The paper (https://hannesweissteiner.com/pdfs/frost.pdf) cites two earlier papers (from 2014 and 2017) that did the same for HDDs.
tosti 3 hours ago I laugh at your spying attempts from my cURL e-mail service that I use instead of a web browser.
lima 5 hours ago Higher IO latencies in HDs might actually make this attack easier - more contention means more bits of data.
falsaberN1 21 hours ago I got $HOME in a huge HDD because it was cheaper. I guess we belong to the cool kids club now?
The paper (https://hannesweissteiner.com/pdfs/frost.pdf) cites two earlier papers (from 2014 and 2017) that did the same for HDDs.
I laugh at your spying attempts from my cURL e-mail service that I use instead of a web browser.
Or mine where the entire browser profile is on a ramdisk.
Higher IO latencies in HDs might actually make this attack easier - more contention means more bits of data.
I got $HOME in a huge HDD because it was cheaper. I guess we belong to the cool kids club now?