Comment by josephg 1 month ago I don’t like the idea Microsoft can bully other websites into blocking content they don’t like. 8 comments josephg Reply akerl_ 1 month ago Do we have any evidence they did that other than the comment you replied to speculating? keepupnow 1 month ago Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary. no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? 4 replies →
akerl_ 1 month ago Do we have any evidence they did that other than the comment you replied to speculating? keepupnow 1 month ago Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary. no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? 4 replies →
keepupnow 1 month ago Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary. no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? 4 replies →
no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? 4 replies →
Do we have any evidence they did that other than the comment you replied to speculating?
Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary.
Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim?
4 replies →