Comment by akerl_ 1 month ago Do we have any evidence they did that other than the comment you replied to speculating? 7 comments akerl_ Reply keepupnow 1 month ago Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary. no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? baobabKoodaa 1 month ago You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to draw that conclusion. snvzz 1 month ago Sure you can provide an alternative explanation?Otherwise, that's the best we have. 2 replies →
keepupnow 1 month ago Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary. no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? baobabKoodaa 1 month ago You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to draw that conclusion. snvzz 1 month ago Sure you can provide an alternative explanation?Otherwise, that's the best we have. 2 replies →
no-name-here 1 month ago Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim? baobabKoodaa 1 month ago You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to draw that conclusion. snvzz 1 month ago Sure you can provide an alternative explanation?Otherwise, that's the best we have. 2 replies →
snvzz 1 month ago Sure you can provide an alternative explanation?Otherwise, that's the best we have. 2 replies →
Yes they definitely did that. Find evidence to the contrary.
Is this sarcasm? Or are you saying that the onus of providing proof is not on the those making the claim, but instead that the onus of proof is on those who did not make the claim?
You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to draw that conclusion.
Sure you can provide an alternative explanation?
Otherwise, that's the best we have.
2 replies →