Comment by mrandish
2 days ago
> The problem here was that they didn't announce to the host that they are doing a test of their in-development equipment.
I might be okay forgiving skirting the disclosure rules BUT only if they tried to be model tenants and, if there was any damage, took steps to proactively make things right. If you're breaking the rules, even if there was no damage, you should definitely be cleaning up and putting things back in place.
This was my thought. I can understand not wanting to go to the hassle of trying to explain that you're testing an experimental prototype robot to a confused Airbnb owner.
What I find inexcusable is not owning up to the damage and paying to fix it when your prototype goes on a rampage of destruction.
Moving fast and breaking things is fine, as long as you fix the stuff you break...
> We are backed by Greenoaks, NFDG, Spark, Eclipse, Kleiner Perkins, Y Combinator, and many others who
are too broke to pay for scratched furniture?
You don't need to rent someone else's house to test your robot. These people all live in houses.
> Moving fast and breaking things is fine, as long as you fix the stuff you break...
What? No its not. Breaking things can cause harm that is not always "fixable", particularly if its not your thing to break.
Well, that statement kinda implied what was broken has to be fixable, at least I thought it did.
And what is going to be impossible to fix or replace in a budget !hotel room?
2 replies →
In a rental unit you should not have things that can’t be replaced. People who rent it will break things, either by accident or purpose (there are always idiots around).
But that like costs money and/or time.