Comment by dnautics 18 hours ago what anti-ai stance? i have multiple projects in zig that are pretty much written by AI, no problem. 4 comments dnautics Reply mihaelm 16 hours ago They're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md...which applies to contributing to the Zig project.The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/"Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects. dnautics 33 minutes ago > too broad of a brushyes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig. epolanski 2 hours ago And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software. dnautics 34 minutes ago tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.
mihaelm 16 hours ago They're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md...which applies to contributing to the Zig project.The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/"Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects. dnautics 33 minutes ago > too broad of a brushyes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig. epolanski 2 hours ago And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software. dnautics 34 minutes ago tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.
dnautics 33 minutes ago > too broad of a brushyes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig.
epolanski 2 hours ago And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software. dnautics 34 minutes ago tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.
They're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md...
which applies to contributing to the Zig project.
The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
"Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects.
> too broad of a brush
yes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig.
And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software.
tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.