← Back to context Comment by dnautics 18 hours ago what anti-ai stance? i have multiple projects in zig that are pretty much written by AI, no problem. 4 comments dnautics Reply mihaelm 17 hours ago They're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md...which applies to contributing to the Zig project.The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/"Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects. dnautics 1 hour ago > too broad of a brushyes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig. epolanski 2 hours ago And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software. dnautics 1 hour ago tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.
mihaelm 17 hours ago They're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md...which applies to contributing to the Zig project.The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/"Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects. dnautics 1 hour ago > too broad of a brushyes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig. epolanski 2 hours ago And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software. dnautics 1 hour ago tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.
dnautics 1 hour ago > too broad of a brushyes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig.
epolanski 2 hours ago And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software. dnautics 1 hour ago tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.
They're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md...
which applies to contributing to the Zig project.
The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
"Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects.
> too broad of a brush
yes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig.
And the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software.
tigerbeetle does not, but the others do.