← Back to context Comment by throw1234567891 17 hours ago It says right there it’s a seashell hard as a rock. Guess why, Sherlock. 4 comments throw1234567891 Reply saaaaaam 16 hours ago No it doesn’t. It says “ I found a fully solid rock that eerily resembles a seashell”. throw1234567891 16 hours ago Well, it's your words against his. You're not much of an expert by your own account in other comments. It's irrelevant if it's from a correct geological period, it's a rock hard seashell. Go and read up the definition of "fossil". margalabargala 16 hours ago To be clear, you are looking at the photographs in the linked article, and asserting that you think it's not a fossil?It's visibly very clearly a fossilized sea shell. You are being a useless pedant about the author's choice of verbiage.
saaaaaam 16 hours ago No it doesn’t. It says “ I found a fully solid rock that eerily resembles a seashell”. throw1234567891 16 hours ago Well, it's your words against his. You're not much of an expert by your own account in other comments. It's irrelevant if it's from a correct geological period, it's a rock hard seashell. Go and read up the definition of "fossil". margalabargala 16 hours ago To be clear, you are looking at the photographs in the linked article, and asserting that you think it's not a fossil?It's visibly very clearly a fossilized sea shell. You are being a useless pedant about the author's choice of verbiage.
throw1234567891 16 hours ago Well, it's your words against his. You're not much of an expert by your own account in other comments. It's irrelevant if it's from a correct geological period, it's a rock hard seashell. Go and read up the definition of "fossil".
margalabargala 16 hours ago To be clear, you are looking at the photographs in the linked article, and asserting that you think it's not a fossil?It's visibly very clearly a fossilized sea shell. You are being a useless pedant about the author's choice of verbiage.
No it doesn’t. It says “ I found a fully solid rock that eerily resembles a seashell”.
Well, it's your words against his. You're not much of an expert by your own account in other comments. It's irrelevant if it's from a correct geological period, it's a rock hard seashell. Go and read up the definition of "fossil".
To be clear, you are looking at the photographs in the linked article, and asserting that you think it's not a fossil?
It's visibly very clearly a fossilized sea shell. You are being a useless pedant about the author's choice of verbiage.