Comment by colechristensen

18 hours ago

Huh? Plenty of places have geology where the rocks were formed under ancient oceans and are full of sea fossils.

Maybe. But I don’t see anything in this piece that says that it’s a fossil, rather than something that resembles this person’s idea of a fossil. It doesn’t look like a fossil to me. It looks like a piece of rock that’s been bashed about a bit.

And given the whole premise of the piece is “this should not be here!” I don’t really understand the point you’re making. The author says it’s a strange find in that area - so either they have a valid point or they don’t.

I don’t know if it’s a fossil. It doesn’t look like a fossil to me. I’m not a fossil expert. The only way to tell if it is a fossil is to do some analysis on the actual specimen before writing screeds about what it might or might not be based on visual similarity.

  • Author points out themselves, in the second paragraph, that its not a strange find. The strangeness of the find is his personal experience. Not that its a strange find geologically.

    • I agree it's not a strange find. Because fossils. But then what was the big deal about finding it?

      Remember, the same author says "I found a seashell in the middle of the desert!" "shouldn't be here" and "coastline 500 miles"

    • And then the author takes a massive leap from “I found a fully solid rock that eerily resembles a seashell” to doing an analysis that treats it as though it actually is a fossil.

      And that analysis finds out that the shell the assumed fossil most resembles is completely out of period.

  • If we're going to rate annoying takes on the internet, "some guy who knows nothing about a topic being snarky because AI was involved" is far worse than somebody doing something with AI.

    • Guy?

      And I think you’re arguing yourself into a hole here.

      What makes you think I know nothing about the topic? I have donated - at their request - three fossils to national museums.

      But I’m not an expert by any stretch.

      4 replies →