Comment by l23k4

5 hours ago

Come on, this was just gross by Tate and the supreme court was right to put a stop to it. I visited the extension before it opened, it was obvious this was going to be a problem.

A busy viewing terrace is not an ordinary use of space, building one looking right into private homes isn't cool regardless of how wealthy the residents of those homes are.

I am looking at this building on the map and it is surrounded by water, hotels, and restaurants. That doesn’t seem like a pure residential area to me. If you don’t want public to see in your house don’t live next to a museum? This is rich people problems and that’s why it lost like 4 times before somehow winning the final. 100 rich people or 10k museum visitors. Hmmmm who should we prioritize.

Can’t all tall buildings see into neighboring buildings? I’ve often seen into peoples houses and watched them eat dinner etc.

  • Yes? That wasn't the complaint.

    Do you have 20+ people looking into your home all day long, taking photos and posting them on instagram?

      Visitors in the viewing gallery frequently look into the claimants' flats and take
      photographs, and less frequently view the claimants and their flats with binoculars.
      Photographs of the flats are posted on social media by visitors. On the platform
      Instagram there were 124 posts in the period between June 2016 and April 2018. It has
      been estimated that those posts reached an audience of 38,600. Mann J found that
      there was a significant number of people using the viewing gallery who demonstrated
      a visual interest in the interiors of the flats, including by looking, peering in, taking
      photographs and waving to the occupants. He accepted that their numbers and the
      level of interest were such that a homeowner would reasonably regard this as intrusive
      so far as the use of the south side of the viewing gallery was concerned (by contrast,
      the western side of the viewing gallery is at an oblique angle to the flats, offering only
      a limited view into them).
    
    
    

    (This goes on and on, and at no point does it sound any better for Tate)

  • I think it would be slightly different if you built and advertised a viewing gallery for that purpose.