Comment by _s_a_m_ 1 day ago So JavaScript didn't work well and is successful? 3 comments _s_a_m_ Reply bayesnet 1 day ago To be fair I think the success of JS is in spite of it not working super well frollogaston 1 day ago JS was designed well. Got a lot of things right that others copied later, and also made improvements without breaking compatibility. And the random weird things like [] == 0 don't come up much in actual usage. arcanemachiner 1 day ago Well, JavaScript isn't a typed language, so the answer to your question can't even be "no".
bayesnet 1 day ago To be fair I think the success of JS is in spite of it not working super well frollogaston 1 day ago JS was designed well. Got a lot of things right that others copied later, and also made improvements without breaking compatibility. And the random weird things like [] == 0 don't come up much in actual usage.
frollogaston 1 day ago JS was designed well. Got a lot of things right that others copied later, and also made improvements without breaking compatibility. And the random weird things like [] == 0 don't come up much in actual usage.
arcanemachiner 1 day ago Well, JavaScript isn't a typed language, so the answer to your question can't even be "no".
To be fair I think the success of JS is in spite of it not working super well
JS was designed well. Got a lot of things right that others copied later, and also made improvements without breaking compatibility. And the random weird things like [] == 0 don't come up much in actual usage.
Well, JavaScript isn't a typed language, so the answer to your question can't even be "no".