← Back to context Comment by cm2012 9 hours ago This would be a masterpiece if it was half as long, the second half is not as convincing or compelling. 3 comments cm2012 Reply jollyllama 7 hours ago Indeed, the leap takes place in the second half.> Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to apologize to weights?How did we leap to this? There's nothing to apologize to. They're weights. garlic_enjoyer 1 hour ago "There's nothing to apologize to. They're weights." - The Meat jdiff 9 hours ago It's nearly a line-by-line rephrasing of another story that's linked at the top. In the second half it takes less creative liberties and sticks closer and closer to the original meat-based text.
jollyllama 7 hours ago Indeed, the leap takes place in the second half.> Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to apologize to weights?How did we leap to this? There's nothing to apologize to. They're weights. garlic_enjoyer 1 hour ago "There's nothing to apologize to. They're weights." - The Meat
jdiff 9 hours ago It's nearly a line-by-line rephrasing of another story that's linked at the top. In the second half it takes less creative liberties and sticks closer and closer to the original meat-based text.
Indeed, the leap takes place in the second half.
> Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to apologize to weights?
How did we leap to this? There's nothing to apologize to. They're weights.
"There's nothing to apologize to. They're weights."
It's nearly a line-by-line rephrasing of another story that's linked at the top. In the second half it takes less creative liberties and sticks closer and closer to the original meat-based text.