Comment by layer8 7 hours ago “Fundamental” rather than “low-level”. Which also matches the article picture. 3 comments layer8 Reply flossly 7 hours ago I was reacting to the parent post. And F and LL are very different. I'd say F is a more subjective metric. layer8 7 hours ago I was reacting to the parent post as well, suggesting that they should have used “fundamental” rather than “low-level”, and that “fundamental” would also match the article picture. flossly 6 hours ago Dunno. I think the pic is useless. SQL is not in the foundation of all those langs.SQL is still very useful after all these years: that's the point that anyone will agree on.Not low level. Not "fundamental" (by most definitions I can think of).
flossly 7 hours ago I was reacting to the parent post. And F and LL are very different. I'd say F is a more subjective metric. layer8 7 hours ago I was reacting to the parent post as well, suggesting that they should have used “fundamental” rather than “low-level”, and that “fundamental” would also match the article picture. flossly 6 hours ago Dunno. I think the pic is useless. SQL is not in the foundation of all those langs.SQL is still very useful after all these years: that's the point that anyone will agree on.Not low level. Not "fundamental" (by most definitions I can think of).
layer8 7 hours ago I was reacting to the parent post as well, suggesting that they should have used “fundamental” rather than “low-level”, and that “fundamental” would also match the article picture. flossly 6 hours ago Dunno. I think the pic is useless. SQL is not in the foundation of all those langs.SQL is still very useful after all these years: that's the point that anyone will agree on.Not low level. Not "fundamental" (by most definitions I can think of).
flossly 6 hours ago Dunno. I think the pic is useless. SQL is not in the foundation of all those langs.SQL is still very useful after all these years: that's the point that anyone will agree on.Not low level. Not "fundamental" (by most definitions I can think of).
I was reacting to the parent post. And F and LL are very different. I'd say F is a more subjective metric.
I was reacting to the parent post as well, suggesting that they should have used “fundamental” rather than “low-level”, and that “fundamental” would also match the article picture.
Dunno. I think the pic is useless. SQL is not in the foundation of all those langs.
SQL is still very useful after all these years: that's the point that anyone will agree on.
Not low level. Not "fundamental" (by most definitions I can think of).