Comment by dofm

> Only stoneagers would say that they are better than a good AI.

I am only a bit above average and I clearly still write better code than a good AI.

The only question left in my mind, alas, is whether that is enough to earn a living.

I mean: it is clear that in every domain except for programming, a talented XYZer can do better than an appropriate LLM trained to do XYZ (except perhaps in some absolutely exhausting pattern recognition tasks).

So I am not sure why we see our own field as different. A sort of inverted Gell-Mann amnesia?