Comment by olejorgenb
1 month ago
One counter example: https://nextgraph.org/elfa-consortium-encrypted-local-first-... (eg.. https://www.ironcalc.com/)
1 month ago
One counter example: https://nextgraph.org/elfa-consortium-encrypted-local-first-... (eg.. https://www.ironcalc.com/)
Is it really a counter example?
"Gathering 12 partners for at least 3 years, towards a suite composed of 16 apps!"
Read the About page and tell me what is it exactly that you will be paying for? https://nextgraph.org/introduction/
I mean we all agree of how good are the values posted on these page, but what are we paying for? Oh I see: https://nextgraph.org/roadmap/
No LOL, this is where your money is going... At the same time, the maintainers of the openssl, sqllite, openssh, ... or for example NGINX that now belongs to big american company...
> throwing shitload of money to the big actors of a field
My reply was directed at this part. Based on my memory seeing ironcalc specifically getting funding. Unless they hide it well they are not a big actor. And the project looks interesting and worthy to me. (I see I should have omitted the nextgraph link as I'm not familiar at all with that project)
Few of the projects listed here seems to be big actors: https://nlnet.nl/project/index.html
Some projects funded by NLnet: Organic Maps, KDE Connect, KDE Plasma Wayland, Bottles (Builds on Wine IIRC), Briar, mitmproxy, Nextcloud, Wireguard
Note: NLnet is an independent organization, but it seems to get quite some support from EU. Maybe you would argue NLnet itself is a big actor?
I think funding already established, respected donor organizations is a decent strategy.