Comment by jsnell 4 hours ago That blog post is very clear about the maintainer having no access to Mythos. 2 comments jsnell Reply IsTom 3 hours ago Does that matter that somebody else ran it for him? jsnell 1 hour ago When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?
IsTom 3 hours ago Does that matter that somebody else ran it for him? jsnell 1 hour ago When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?
jsnell 1 hour ago When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?
Does that matter that somebody else ran it for him?
When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.
And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?