Comment by pbiggar 13 hours ago [edit] Removed as my link was to a different Eric Ries. 5 comments pbiggar Reply gcheong 12 hours ago Wrong Eric Ries? The writer of that blog claims to be a 65 yo Baby Boomer (would be 67 today), the one here is much younger than that iirc. willguest 12 hours ago yes, this is the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ries pbiggar 11 hours ago Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true. spencerflem 12 hours ago Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one migueldeicaza 13 hours ago Wow I didn’t know that.That is deeply disappointing.
gcheong 12 hours ago Wrong Eric Ries? The writer of that blog claims to be a 65 yo Baby Boomer (would be 67 today), the one here is much younger than that iirc. willguest 12 hours ago yes, this is the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ries pbiggar 11 hours ago Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true. spencerflem 12 hours ago Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one
pbiggar 11 hours ago Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true.
spencerflem 12 hours ago Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one
Wrong Eric Ries? The writer of that blog claims to be a 65 yo Baby Boomer (would be 67 today), the one here is much younger than that iirc.
yes, this is the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ries
Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true.
Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one
Wow I didn’t know that.
That is deeply disappointing.