← Back to context Comment by pbiggar 3 months ago [edit] Removed as my link was to a different Eric Ries. 5 comments pbiggar Reply gcheong 3 months ago Wrong Eric Ries? The writer of that blog claims to be a 65 yo Baby Boomer (would be 67 today), the one here is much younger than that iirc. willguest 3 months ago yes, this is the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ries pbiggar 3 months ago Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true. spencerflem 3 months ago Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one migueldeicaza 3 months ago Wow I didn’t know that.That is deeply disappointing.
gcheong 3 months ago Wrong Eric Ries? The writer of that blog claims to be a 65 yo Baby Boomer (would be 67 today), the one here is much younger than that iirc. willguest 3 months ago yes, this is the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ries pbiggar 3 months ago Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true. spencerflem 3 months ago Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one
pbiggar 3 months ago Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true.
spencerflem 3 months ago Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one
Wrong Eric Ries? The writer of that blog claims to be a 65 yo Baby Boomer (would be 67 today), the one here is much younger than that iirc.
yes, this is the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ries
Thanks for catching that, should have done a better job vetting that. The rest of my post is still true.
Yeah, the bio in About specifically mentions that they are not the famous one
Wow I didn’t know that.
That is deeply disappointing.