Comment by bertili 20 hours ago This is GLM 5.2 Max. GLM 5.2 High which use less than half[1] the tokens.[1] https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.2 3 comments bertili Reply Tiberium 20 hours ago Yes, but the Artificial Analysis result is also from GLM 5.2 (max), not high. andai 20 hours ago They have this with a lot of models, measuring only the max setting, while the one you'd actually want to use for most tasks is much lower. epolanski 20 hours ago For the brief period with had Fable, I never had to use it above medium.Low nailed the overwhelming majority of mundane tasks on it's own, medium was good for more complex stuff.
Tiberium 20 hours ago Yes, but the Artificial Analysis result is also from GLM 5.2 (max), not high. andai 20 hours ago They have this with a lot of models, measuring only the max setting, while the one you'd actually want to use for most tasks is much lower. epolanski 20 hours ago For the brief period with had Fable, I never had to use it above medium.Low nailed the overwhelming majority of mundane tasks on it's own, medium was good for more complex stuff.
andai 20 hours ago They have this with a lot of models, measuring only the max setting, while the one you'd actually want to use for most tasks is much lower. epolanski 20 hours ago For the brief period with had Fable, I never had to use it above medium.Low nailed the overwhelming majority of mundane tasks on it's own, medium was good for more complex stuff.
epolanski 20 hours ago For the brief period with had Fable, I never had to use it above medium.Low nailed the overwhelming majority of mundane tasks on it's own, medium was good for more complex stuff.
Yes, but the Artificial Analysis result is also from GLM 5.2 (max), not high.
They have this with a lot of models, measuring only the max setting, while the one you'd actually want to use for most tasks is much lower.
For the brief period with had Fable, I never had to use it above medium.
Low nailed the overwhelming majority of mundane tasks on it's own, medium was good for more complex stuff.