Comment by estearum

17 hours ago

> This is a completely derivative conclusion from something I learned in molecular biology as an undergrad. The only "new" thing here is saying that poor people live in environments, since we've known for literally decades that DNA methylation is affected by environment.

Yes, just like approximately everything we've learned about cosmology in the last 100 years are completely derivative conclusions from relativity lmao. There's what, <5 things we've discovered that are not completely derivative over 100 years and billions of dollars of research?

> I don't know [how to mitigate health disparities]! You tell me how your "potentially useful" information provides a solution. Win me over!

Huh? I didn't claim to have all the answers lol, you did.

> Yes, just like approximately everything we've learned about cosmology in the last 100 years are completely derivative conclusions from relativity lmao.

OK, cool. Let's not do more of that, then. I just said that I could see the difference between the questions, and that they're not likely to get funding elsewhere, not that we should absolutely fund more black hole space telescopes.

> There's what, <5 things we've discovered that are not completely derivative over 100 years and billions of dollars of research?

No. Not in the same class as "are poor people sicker than rich people", or "does gravity cause things to fall down". Next question.

  • FYI we've discovered precisely 0 (zero) things in cosmology or physics more broadly, or even material science, in the last 100 years that aren't derivable from relativity lol.

    Does your tirade copy/paste to that entire field too?