Comment by ComputerGuru 11 hours ago Would you be able to run it against Gemini Flash (not Lite) 3.0, high thinking? 2 comments ComputerGuru Reply ponyous 11 hours ago Absolutely. Running it now, will update this comment in about 30 mins.Edit: Surprisingly very good results with 3.0 flash with high thinking.Cost: $0.06Duration: 3.22 minCode Errors: 1.3 per attempts (meaning on average it had to retry 1.3 times)Adherence was on par with 3.5 flash Low thinking ComputerGuru 11 hours ago Thanks! I’ve still been using 3.0 a lot, the price-to-performance ratio absolutely kills compared to Google’s other and newer offerings.
ponyous 11 hours ago Absolutely. Running it now, will update this comment in about 30 mins.Edit: Surprisingly very good results with 3.0 flash with high thinking.Cost: $0.06Duration: 3.22 minCode Errors: 1.3 per attempts (meaning on average it had to retry 1.3 times)Adherence was on par with 3.5 flash Low thinking ComputerGuru 11 hours ago Thanks! I’ve still been using 3.0 a lot, the price-to-performance ratio absolutely kills compared to Google’s other and newer offerings.
ComputerGuru 11 hours ago Thanks! I’ve still been using 3.0 a lot, the price-to-performance ratio absolutely kills compared to Google’s other and newer offerings.
Absolutely. Running it now, will update this comment in about 30 mins.
Edit: Surprisingly very good results with 3.0 flash with high thinking.
Cost: $0.06
Duration: 3.22 min
Code Errors: 1.3 per attempts (meaning on average it had to retry 1.3 times)
Adherence was on par with 3.5 flash Low thinking
Thanks! I’ve still been using 3.0 a lot, the price-to-performance ratio absolutely kills compared to Google’s other and newer offerings.