Comment by maelito 1 day ago It means that marketers won over technical, factual people. 11 comments maelito Reply oytis 1 day ago Not marketers, lobbyists pocksuppet 1 day ago Probably marketers in this one. Marketers who know how to access politicians adn get invited to WEF.The distinction: marketers know how to trick people, lobbyists bribe them. oytis 1 day ago That's not lobbyism, that's straight corruption. Lobbyism is, at least in theory, about convincing politicians 3 replies → rapnie 1 day ago Both? But yea, if you see the Advisory Board shown in an image lower in the article, you get the general idea. oytis 1 day ago Obama making an account on Twitter is a marketers' success. Twitter became popular first, politicians wanted to appear there second.WSocial just went to politicians directly,it's not known by general public. Good news is, it rarely helps with commercial success CurryFurry 6 hours ago NGOs are also lobbyists, and of the worse kind. lenerdenator 1 day ago Not lobbyists, bribers. xg15 1 day ago The marketers or the so far unnamed private investors.
oytis 1 day ago Not marketers, lobbyists pocksuppet 1 day ago Probably marketers in this one. Marketers who know how to access politicians adn get invited to WEF.The distinction: marketers know how to trick people, lobbyists bribe them. oytis 1 day ago That's not lobbyism, that's straight corruption. Lobbyism is, at least in theory, about convincing politicians 3 replies → rapnie 1 day ago Both? But yea, if you see the Advisory Board shown in an image lower in the article, you get the general idea. oytis 1 day ago Obama making an account on Twitter is a marketers' success. Twitter became popular first, politicians wanted to appear there second.WSocial just went to politicians directly,it's not known by general public. Good news is, it rarely helps with commercial success CurryFurry 6 hours ago NGOs are also lobbyists, and of the worse kind. lenerdenator 1 day ago Not lobbyists, bribers.
pocksuppet 1 day ago Probably marketers in this one. Marketers who know how to access politicians adn get invited to WEF.The distinction: marketers know how to trick people, lobbyists bribe them. oytis 1 day ago That's not lobbyism, that's straight corruption. Lobbyism is, at least in theory, about convincing politicians 3 replies →
oytis 1 day ago That's not lobbyism, that's straight corruption. Lobbyism is, at least in theory, about convincing politicians 3 replies →
rapnie 1 day ago Both? But yea, if you see the Advisory Board shown in an image lower in the article, you get the general idea. oytis 1 day ago Obama making an account on Twitter is a marketers' success. Twitter became popular first, politicians wanted to appear there second.WSocial just went to politicians directly,it's not known by general public. Good news is, it rarely helps with commercial success
oytis 1 day ago Obama making an account on Twitter is a marketers' success. Twitter became popular first, politicians wanted to appear there second.WSocial just went to politicians directly,it's not known by general public. Good news is, it rarely helps with commercial success
Not marketers, lobbyists
Probably marketers in this one. Marketers who know how to access politicians adn get invited to WEF.
The distinction: marketers know how to trick people, lobbyists bribe them.
That's not lobbyism, that's straight corruption. Lobbyism is, at least in theory, about convincing politicians
3 replies →
Both? But yea, if you see the Advisory Board shown in an image lower in the article, you get the general idea.
Obama making an account on Twitter is a marketers' success. Twitter became popular first, politicians wanted to appear there second.
WSocial just went to politicians directly,it's not known by general public. Good news is, it rarely helps with commercial success
NGOs are also lobbyists, and of the worse kind.
Not lobbyists, bribers.
The marketers or the so far unnamed private investors.