Comment by mjhay
9 hours ago
The onus is you to show it makes children safer - you’re the one advocating these privacy-harming rules.
9 hours ago
The onus is you to show it makes children safer - you’re the one advocating these privacy-harming rules.
If you insist on that approach, then for the sake of argument, you could pretend the discussion is about Australia which already has a similar law.
You could argue the benefit to children in repealing it.
Nope. The burden is on whoever wants to restrict people. If you want a new restriction, the burden is on you. If you want to keep an existing restriction, the burden is still on you.