Comment by guerrilla
3 months ago
> Nationalist, sure.
That's pretty far-right by itself. The fact that they want mass deportations should solidify it for you though.
3 months ago
> Nationalist, sure.
That's pretty far-right by itself. The fact that they want mass deportations should solidify it for you though.
It's definitely possible to be a left-wing nationalist
Canada's (mainstream) nationalism is also part of its political left.
I mean it's definitely possible to call yourself that, but I'd argue no, it's not possible to actually be that.
How would you describe North Korea?
4 replies →
Then you have never studied communist eastern countries and their nationalistic policies.
https://socialhistoryportal.org/news/articles/110357
Famously, Mao Zedong was neither left-wing, nor a nationalist, right?
[flagged]
No-one defines what they mean by "nationalist" so it could apply to a rock.
Here, I’ll define it: nationalist is the idea that nations, including the concept of borders, are a great way to organize people to prevent situations like what Sweden is going through.
[flagged]
> celebrate that culture.
The party explicitly votes against paying for local culture
> wanting to protect
There is a big difference for wanting to protect culture, as in celebrate, educate and promote, and removing people from the land that has that culture. I would say the two are orthogonal.
For example, a huge influence on the British music scene comes from either getting pissed in Hamburg, or music coming from the Caribbean. None of which could have happened if people were dead set on "re-migration" (ie removing non "white" people.)
You can protect your “culture” without deporting all non-White people. If your culture can’t be protected without that, maybe that culture doesn’t need protecting.
[flagged]
7 replies →