It should be obvious that it is utterly incompatible with the values and mission of Mullvad for a Mullvad executive to give a large amount money from Mullvad customers to advance public policy with the primary and direct intent to restrict freedom of expression.
"It should be obvious that Daniel's private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad's values or mission."
Why do you think that quote supports your argument?
If we're going to sealion, why don't you first explain what you think my argument is and why the quote does not support it?
3 replies →
It should be obvious that it is utterly incompatible with the values and mission of Mullvad for a Mullvad executive to give a large amount money from Mullvad customers to advance public policy with the primary and direct intent to restrict freedom of expression.
> to advance public policy with the primary and direct intent to restrict freedom of expression.
I'd love to see you proving this claim as I believe that's not what the party stands for.
Do you have any links/context on how this party plans to restrict freedom of expression?
2 replies →
I have yet to find any proof that this actually part of their political program. Can you elaborate on that?
1 reply →