← Back to context Comment by bingoMen 3 months ago > pro-immigration activistsliterally translated, “humans with empathy” 5 comments bingoMen Reply throwawaypath 3 months ago [flagged] RuslanL 3 months ago [flagged] bingoMen 3 months ago What do you mean by 'no'? copper-float 3 months ago No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make.It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything differently lacks empathy.It's an intentionally insulting, black-and-white view with no nuance, just like how middle schoolers view the world. krieger_857 3 months ago no because it is a very reductionist clause
RuslanL 3 months ago [flagged] bingoMen 3 months ago What do you mean by 'no'? copper-float 3 months ago No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make.It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything differently lacks empathy.It's an intentionally insulting, black-and-white view with no nuance, just like how middle schoolers view the world. krieger_857 3 months ago no because it is a very reductionist clause
bingoMen 3 months ago What do you mean by 'no'? copper-float 3 months ago No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make.It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything differently lacks empathy.It's an intentionally insulting, black-and-white view with no nuance, just like how middle schoolers view the world. krieger_857 3 months ago no because it is a very reductionist clause
copper-float 3 months ago No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make.It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything differently lacks empathy.It's an intentionally insulting, black-and-white view with no nuance, just like how middle schoolers view the world.
[flagged]
[flagged]
What do you mean by 'no'?
No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make.
It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything differently lacks empathy.
It's an intentionally insulting, black-and-white view with no nuance, just like how middle schoolers view the world.
no because it is a very reductionist clause