Comment by hahahaa 6 days ago This is not AI 4 comments hahahaa Reply b40d-48b2-979e 6 days ago The headings style wasn't an immediate giveaway to you? The rules of three in every. short. staccato. paragraph? The X, not Y?The author's writing is wildly different pre-AI. ggambetta 5 days ago For me it was "There’s a clean exception to all of this, and it flips the entire logic." and "here’s the reframe". That's Claude-speak. maaarghk 5 days ago You could say it flipped their entire logic. Not that it would make sense. But I groaned reading it. hahahaa 5 days ago I reckon the article was edited so I saw a different version. I noticed the HN title and current title differ.
b40d-48b2-979e 6 days ago The headings style wasn't an immediate giveaway to you? The rules of three in every. short. staccato. paragraph? The X, not Y?The author's writing is wildly different pre-AI. ggambetta 5 days ago For me it was "There’s a clean exception to all of this, and it flips the entire logic." and "here’s the reframe". That's Claude-speak. maaarghk 5 days ago You could say it flipped their entire logic. Not that it would make sense. But I groaned reading it. hahahaa 5 days ago I reckon the article was edited so I saw a different version. I noticed the HN title and current title differ.
ggambetta 5 days ago For me it was "There’s a clean exception to all of this, and it flips the entire logic." and "here’s the reframe". That's Claude-speak.
maaarghk 5 days ago You could say it flipped their entire logic. Not that it would make sense. But I groaned reading it.
hahahaa 5 days ago I reckon the article was edited so I saw a different version. I noticed the HN title and current title differ.
The headings style wasn't an immediate giveaway to you? The rules of three in every. short. staccato. paragraph? The X, not Y?
The author's writing is wildly different pre-AI.
For me it was "There’s a clean exception to all of this, and it flips the entire logic." and "here’s the reframe". That's Claude-speak.
You could say it flipped their entire logic. Not that it would make sense. But I groaned reading it.
I reckon the article was edited so I saw a different version. I noticed the HN title and current title differ.