Comment by Schiendelman 5 days ago Absolutely! Fitness scales super closely with localized population density. 2 comments Schiendelman Reply Earw0rm 5 days ago This is a recent phenomenon.The original reason for low population density was agricultural work, which - even in the early days of mechanisation - was plenty physical.Living in exurbia to work and consume like a city dweller is a new kind of stupid. Schiendelman 5 days ago Yep, and we caused it, through the massive subsidy to cars that was the federal highway program. Many tranches of spending, from ~1937 forward, caused this.
Earw0rm 5 days ago This is a recent phenomenon.The original reason for low population density was agricultural work, which - even in the early days of mechanisation - was plenty physical.Living in exurbia to work and consume like a city dweller is a new kind of stupid. Schiendelman 5 days ago Yep, and we caused it, through the massive subsidy to cars that was the federal highway program. Many tranches of spending, from ~1937 forward, caused this.
Schiendelman 5 days ago Yep, and we caused it, through the massive subsidy to cars that was the federal highway program. Many tranches of spending, from ~1937 forward, caused this.
This is a recent phenomenon.
The original reason for low population density was agricultural work, which - even in the early days of mechanisation - was plenty physical.
Living in exurbia to work and consume like a city dweller is a new kind of stupid.
Yep, and we caused it, through the massive subsidy to cars that was the federal highway program. Many tranches of spending, from ~1937 forward, caused this.