Comment by Retr0id 4 days ago TLS certs are freeeeee 5 comments Retr0id Reply radiator 4 days ago Judging from this very release, where he implemented support for page-level checksums and encryption for LMBD, I assume the author knows a thing or two about encryption. He probably then deemed it unnecessary for this specific website. Retr0id 4 days ago Cryptography engineers are not excluded from being lazy sysadmins. radiator 4 days ago What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first. 1 reply →
radiator 4 days ago Judging from this very release, where he implemented support for page-level checksums and encryption for LMBD, I assume the author knows a thing or two about encryption. He probably then deemed it unnecessary for this specific website. Retr0id 4 days ago Cryptography engineers are not excluded from being lazy sysadmins. radiator 4 days ago What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first. 1 reply →
Retr0id 4 days ago Cryptography engineers are not excluded from being lazy sysadmins. radiator 4 days ago What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first. 1 reply →
radiator 4 days ago What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first. 1 reply →
Judging from this very release, where he implemented support for page-level checksums and encryption for LMBD, I assume the author knows a thing or two about encryption. He probably then deemed it unnecessary for this specific website.
Cryptography engineers are not excluded from being lazy sysadmins.
What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?
Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first.
1 reply →