Comment by Retr0id 4 days ago Cryptography engineers are not excluded from being lazy sysadmins. 2 comments Retr0id Reply radiator 4 days ago What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first. hyc_symas 3 days ago Indeed, there's no need to use the doc website. There's nothing there that isn't embedded in the LMDB source code. All of the docs are generated from doxygen comments in the source.
radiator 4 days ago What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first. hyc_symas 3 days ago Indeed, there's no need to use the doc website. There's nothing there that isn't embedded in the LMDB source code. All of the docs are generated from doxygen comments in the source.
hyc_symas 3 days ago Indeed, there's no need to use the doc website. There's nothing there that isn't embedded in the LMDB source code. All of the docs are generated from doxygen comments in the source.
What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?
Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first.
Indeed, there's no need to use the doc website. There's nothing there that isn't embedded in the LMDB source code. All of the docs are generated from doxygen comments in the source.