Comment by brontitall
4 days ago
I think the point here is that the Disk II controller did _not_ have a microprocessor or microcontroller. Rather, it was driven by software that ran on the system CPU, requiring minimal additional hardware
4 days ago
I think the point here is that the Disk II controller did _not_ have a microprocessor or microcontroller. Rather, it was driven by software that ran on the system CPU, requiring minimal additional hardware
No comments yet
Contribute on Hacker News ↗