Comment by dangoodmanUT 4 days ago i believe the author is confusedthis is the wrong direction(jk i read the readme) 1 comment dangoodmanUT Reply sylware 3 days ago Nope, and c++ should get the same thing.But we now all know rust is microsoft and c++ ISO. I don't think we can trust much more ISO than microsoft to produce less feature creep over the currently known planned obsolescence cycle of 5-10 years.
sylware 3 days ago Nope, and c++ should get the same thing.But we now all know rust is microsoft and c++ ISO. I don't think we can trust much more ISO than microsoft to produce less feature creep over the currently known planned obsolescence cycle of 5-10 years.
Nope, and c++ should get the same thing.
But we now all know rust is microsoft and c++ ISO. I don't think we can trust much more ISO than microsoft to produce less feature creep over the currently known planned obsolescence cycle of 5-10 years.