Comment by mrtksn

1 day ago

The headline is wrong. The article and the headline seems to be written in a way to cause outrage by giving the impression that the EU requires cameras which should be recording your face all the time and storing/sending it to authorities or something but what the EU actually requires is "Advanced Driver Distraction Warning System" which may be implemented using cameras and no recording or transmitting is required, in fact actually recording and transmitting would be a problem with GDPR.

This is what we call a slippery slope

  • Nope, that's not what we call slippery slope. This system does not require data recording or sharing, does not require cameras.

I don't think it's misleading at all. Is it a camera that's aimed at your face? It seems like it.

  • Nope, the laws require Advanced Driver Distraction Warning System and does not require cameras aimed at your face.

    Also, cameras are receivers. Nothing happens when cameras are aimed at your face, it is only significant when you are interested with the received image and it actually nothing happens, it is processed on device to see if you are tired/distracted/asleep.

    Here is the actual text: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2590/oj/eng

    They mention that cameras are required when testing the systems compliance but does not specify how these systems should work.

I remember the brief period when they told us that the self service checkout weren't recording video. Then they just said oh actually they do now and nobody battered an eye lid

If the tech is put there it's just a matter of time. They can't resist