Comment by bayesianbot

7 hours ago

That is exciting!

I don't understand how DeepSeek can be so cheap with their cache pricing - ~0.003 usd / 1Mtok. 100x less than Kimi K3, or similar numbers against pretty much any other decently sized model to my knowledge. I've been using it whenever possible as even longer agent sessions cost few cents.

If you read DeepSeek's papers, you'll find a litany of architectural features that allow for a greatly reduced cache hit price by shrinking the size of the KV-cache.

  • How come no other big model seems to be able to deliver the same type of extremely low cache cost though, if their techniques are public?

    • I think the "architectural features" are part of the model, not the kv cache. So implementing it would be difficult and expensive.

    • Many of these techniques haven't been published very long ago - it often takes a good 6-8 months for techniques to percolate. But also, they come at a complexity cost and, seemingly, also at a stability cost.

      1 reply →