Comment by khalic 3 months ago https://postimg.cc/n9nZGLmbGoodness of Fit 0.911, Kurtosis -0.849, Skewness: 0.073It's very much a bell curve 10 comments khalic Reply fluoridation 3 months ago Just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve. There are quite obvious separate phenomena shaping the curve at different times. khalic 3 months ago > just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curveI'm going to assume this is bait... jdlshore 3 months ago Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape. 1 reply → samatman 3 months ago You can't call it a bell curve unless it's from the Charles Murray region. It's just sparkling statistics. strken 3 months ago Do you mean "just because it's a bell curve, doesn't make it a normal distribution"? fluoridation 3 months ago No, I meant what I said. 3uruiueijjj 3 months ago Those graphs look nothing alike, except for "going up and then vaguely going down." khalic 3 months ago I don't know what to say other than learn math
fluoridation 3 months ago Just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve. There are quite obvious separate phenomena shaping the curve at different times. khalic 3 months ago > just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curveI'm going to assume this is bait... jdlshore 3 months ago Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape. 1 reply → samatman 3 months ago You can't call it a bell curve unless it's from the Charles Murray region. It's just sparkling statistics. strken 3 months ago Do you mean "just because it's a bell curve, doesn't make it a normal distribution"? fluoridation 3 months ago No, I meant what I said.
khalic 3 months ago > just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curveI'm going to assume this is bait... jdlshore 3 months ago Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape. 1 reply → samatman 3 months ago You can't call it a bell curve unless it's from the Charles Murray region. It's just sparkling statistics.
jdlshore 3 months ago Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape. 1 reply →
samatman 3 months ago You can't call it a bell curve unless it's from the Charles Murray region. It's just sparkling statistics.
strken 3 months ago Do you mean "just because it's a bell curve, doesn't make it a normal distribution"? fluoridation 3 months ago No, I meant what I said.
3uruiueijjj 3 months ago Those graphs look nothing alike, except for "going up and then vaguely going down." khalic 3 months ago I don't know what to say other than learn math
Just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve. There are quite obvious separate phenomena shaping the curve at different times.
> just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve
I'm going to assume this is bait...
Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape.
1 reply →
You can't call it a bell curve unless it's from the Charles Murray region. It's just sparkling statistics.
Do you mean "just because it's a bell curve, doesn't make it a normal distribution"?
No, I meant what I said.
Those graphs look nothing alike, except for "going up and then vaguely going down."
I don't know what to say other than learn math