Comment by cromka 16 hours ago Because it promotes recycling instead of being another tax. 4 comments cromka Reply pyuser583 13 hours ago Recycling an object almost always means destroying it. dash2 13 hours ago A tax would also promote recycling, since that would avoid the tax? cromka 9 hours ago How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance? dash2 4 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
dash2 13 hours ago A tax would also promote recycling, since that would avoid the tax? cromka 9 hours ago How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance? dash2 4 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
cromka 9 hours ago How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance? dash2 4 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
dash2 4 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
Recycling an object almost always means destroying it.
A tax would also promote recycling, since that would avoid the tax?
How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance?
The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.