← Back to context Comment by cromka 1 day ago Because it promotes recycling instead of being another tax. 4 comments cromka Reply pyuser583 1 day ago Recycling an object almost always means destroying it. dash2 1 day ago A tax would also promote recycling, since that would avoid the tax? cromka 18 hours ago How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance? dash2 13 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
dash2 1 day ago A tax would also promote recycling, since that would avoid the tax? cromka 18 hours ago How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance? dash2 13 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
cromka 18 hours ago How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance? dash2 13 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
dash2 13 hours ago The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.
Recycling an object almost always means destroying it.
A tax would also promote recycling, since that would avoid the tax?
How's that different to current asking for recycling and fining on incompliance?
The difference is that a tax can be per-item, and doesn't need as much regulatory and legal machinery.