Comment by vivzkestrel 11 hours ago - it is a very very very very fancy autocomplete 17 comments vivzkestrel Reply sanderjd 11 hours ago Each year, as the models improve, we add one more "very". lioeters 11 hours ago Extrapolating as "very" approaches infinity: "Let there be light!" ritzaco 11 hours ago how many do you add before they become more fancy at auto complete than humans though tovej 11 hours ago Human developers generally don't autocomplete. 5 replies → sanderjd 11 hours ago 12? vivzkestrel 11 hours ago - its like going at the speed of light to achieve 100% accuracy.- you ll keep getting closer and closer but you ll never be at 100% as long as you have a non zero mass xnorswap 11 hours ago Sure, but it's at the point now where it can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into a complete working product. bigstrat2003 11 hours ago No, it isn't. It can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into something that may or may not match the original vision and almost certainly has serious bugs which only manifest over time because they elude a cursory test. Valodim 11 hours ago You say that as if it wasn't true for anything human programmers ever produced 3 replies →
sanderjd 11 hours ago Each year, as the models improve, we add one more "very". lioeters 11 hours ago Extrapolating as "very" approaches infinity: "Let there be light!" ritzaco 11 hours ago how many do you add before they become more fancy at auto complete than humans though tovej 11 hours ago Human developers generally don't autocomplete. 5 replies → sanderjd 11 hours ago 12? vivzkestrel 11 hours ago - its like going at the speed of light to achieve 100% accuracy.- you ll keep getting closer and closer but you ll never be at 100% as long as you have a non zero mass
ritzaco 11 hours ago how many do you add before they become more fancy at auto complete than humans though tovej 11 hours ago Human developers generally don't autocomplete. 5 replies → sanderjd 11 hours ago 12?
vivzkestrel 11 hours ago - its like going at the speed of light to achieve 100% accuracy.- you ll keep getting closer and closer but you ll never be at 100% as long as you have a non zero mass
xnorswap 11 hours ago Sure, but it's at the point now where it can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into a complete working product. bigstrat2003 11 hours ago No, it isn't. It can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into something that may or may not match the original vision and almost certainly has serious bugs which only manifest over time because they elude a cursory test. Valodim 11 hours ago You say that as if it wasn't true for anything human programmers ever produced 3 replies →
bigstrat2003 11 hours ago No, it isn't. It can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into something that may or may not match the original vision and almost certainly has serious bugs which only manifest over time because they elude a cursory test. Valodim 11 hours ago You say that as if it wasn't true for anything human programmers ever produced 3 replies →
Valodim 11 hours ago You say that as if it wasn't true for anything human programmers ever produced 3 replies →
Each year, as the models improve, we add one more "very".
Extrapolating as "very" approaches infinity: "Let there be light!"
how many do you add before they become more fancy at auto complete than humans though
Human developers generally don't autocomplete.
5 replies →
12?
- its like going at the speed of light to achieve 100% accuracy.
- you ll keep getting closer and closer but you ll never be at 100% as long as you have a non zero mass
Sure, but it's at the point now where it can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into a complete working product.
No, it isn't. It can autocomplete a fragment of a sketch of an idea into something that may or may not match the original vision and almost certainly has serious bugs which only manifest over time because they elude a cursory test.
You say that as if it wasn't true for anything human programmers ever produced
3 replies →