Comment by throw1234567891 8 hours ago Would you call a trade-in a fraudulent tactic? 8 comments throw1234567891 Reply lmm 1 hour ago Trade ins are fine. A contractual commitment to not buy hardware sounds like illegal restraint of trade. InsideOutSanta 8 hours ago Trade-ins are voluntary. efficax 8 hours ago so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore InsideOutSanta 7 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 3 replies →
lmm 1 hour ago Trade ins are fine. A contractual commitment to not buy hardware sounds like illegal restraint of trade.
InsideOutSanta 8 hours ago Trade-ins are voluntary. efficax 8 hours ago so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore InsideOutSanta 7 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 3 replies →
efficax 8 hours ago so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore InsideOutSanta 7 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 3 replies →
InsideOutSanta 7 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 3 replies →
Trade ins are fine. A contractual commitment to not buy hardware sounds like illegal restraint of trade.
Trade-ins are voluntary.
so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore
> so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract
Right, so they're not voluntary.
3 replies →