← Back to context Comment by throw1234567891 10 hours ago Would you call a trade-in a fraudulent tactic? 9 comments throw1234567891 Reply lmm 3 hours ago Trade ins are fine. A contractual commitment to not buy hardware sounds like illegal restraint of trade. InsideOutSanta 10 hours ago Trade-ins are voluntary. efficax 10 hours ago so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore InsideOutSanta 9 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 4 replies →
lmm 3 hours ago Trade ins are fine. A contractual commitment to not buy hardware sounds like illegal restraint of trade.
InsideOutSanta 10 hours ago Trade-ins are voluntary. efficax 10 hours ago so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore InsideOutSanta 9 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 4 replies →
efficax 10 hours ago so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore InsideOutSanta 9 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 4 replies →
InsideOutSanta 9 hours ago > so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contractRight, so they're not voluntary. 4 replies →
Trade ins are fine. A contractual commitment to not buy hardware sounds like illegal restraint of trade.
Trade-ins are voluntary.
so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract. there's no way they didn't have an escape clause, although likely it meant not using the cloud provider anymore
> so are buybacks. you choose to sign the contract
Right, so they're not voluntary.
4 replies →