A visa is no guarantee of entry into the US (or other countries) in the first place, let alone something guaranteed to never, ever be revoked.
A country can allow, or disallow, entry by an alien at any time. A country can revoke permission for an alien to stay in that country at any time. The only entity it is responsible for answering to is its own laws and procedures (which the country may change at its discretion), and not the wishes/demands/pleas of said alien.
This isnt at entry, this is people living legally in the USA for years. You're a sick heartless piece of shit if your opinion is really that the country should throw anyone in a concentration camp without reason at any time.
That they should not be in the US, does not override the need for the government to obey the law. But that also does not mean that the fundamental incoherence of a news article ignoring the issue of illegal aliens having access to government aid–of inherently assuming that "of course they should, bigot"—should be ignored.
Sorry, the "I claim that the ___ social issue exists, therefore we must willfully ignore the completely unrelated breaking of the law that provably occurs" card expired in 2024.
Well, the admin should stop creating illegal aliens by cancelling visas and green cards without reason or notice.
A visa is no guarantee of entry into the US (or other countries) in the first place, let alone something guaranteed to never, ever be revoked.
A country can allow, or disallow, entry by an alien at any time. A country can revoke permission for an alien to stay in that country at any time. The only entity it is responsible for answering to is its own laws and procedures (which the country may change at its discretion), and not the wishes/demands/pleas of said alien.
This isnt at entry, this is people living legally in the USA for years. You're a sick heartless piece of shit if your opinion is really that the country should throw anyone in a concentration camp without reason at any time.
Well, yes.
That they should not be in the US, does not override the need for the government to obey the law. But that also does not mean that the fundamental incoherence of a news article ignoring the issue of illegal aliens having access to government aid–of inherently assuming that "of course they should, bigot"—should be ignored.
When the rich and powerful stealing the actual wealth from under us use it as a jingoistic canard we can actually safely ignore it, yes.
Sorry, the "I claim that the ___ social issue exists, therefore we must willfully ignore the completely unrelated breaking of the law that provably occurs" card expired in 2024.
1 reply →