Comment by sosodev
5 days ago
What would "actual" evidence look like? I have a hard time believing that if they released the logs that people would take it more seriously. The temptation would be to say "they fabricated those for marketing". Just as they supposedly fabricated this story, no?
thye could describe in detail how the LLM did this. That would explain how much - if any - human in the loop was involved, was it comprimised credentials, did it find new exploits or use known ones, etc. Evidence would mean details, not a smoking gun.
They didn't fabricate it. They took off the security guardrails and told it to do some hacking, and they got the exact news-worthy story they wanted when it did exactly that. Everyone acts surprised.
They should release the full prompt. I believe that would be very telling, so they never will.
This is possible. Also it’s possible that there was a big human involvement. Or that there was something less exciting, but the pr department and hyping grifters at the company blown it out of proportions.