Comment by addedGone

4 days ago

Codeberg is also not being considered anymore since they are censoring legitimate projects, crazy honestly, people would have thought that they would be neutral but it's the opposite of neutral, it's way worse than Corporations.

Also, in 1 year tops, no dev will manually code anymore, forcing users to code manually is absurd.

10 comments

addedGone

Reply
ethin  4 days ago

This is a pretty great strawman of what their actual terms of service and blog post says. You might want to read both quite thoroughly.

  • addedGone  4 days ago

    It isn't, I'm literally not allowed to host a project on it, knowing obviously it's 100% "LLM-made" nowadays, no modern softwares can be hosted on it, Bun can't be hosted on it (100% "AI" now), you don't find it ridiculous? The world is changing, they don't want to acknowledge it.

    The cryptocurrency related projects ban is also insane knowing how much it has contributed to having greater crypto librairies, including all the newer zK stuff.

    The entire planet is migrating towards AI coding, and Codeberg is going the opposite way, it's a sure way to die, let's speak about it in 2028 where I'm ready to bet that less than 0.1% of all software dev will be manually editing files.

    To me, it seems that they can't manage their infrastructure properly cost wise and decide instead to punish the users for it.

    • ethin  4 days ago

      No, I don't find it ridiculous:

      1. You are not entitled to a website hosting your content. A website refusing to host you is not censorship in any form whatsoever.

      2. I'm pretty positive they did this because of infrastructure reasons as a secondary reason to their mission. LLMs mean people can just pump out projects at light speed, and that costs money to both host and do things with on CI/CD. If you want that potentially to be lifted in the future, pay them so they are able to have that infrastructure.