Comment by inigyou 2 days ago Some Rust programs also had RCE CVEs. 3 comments inigyou Reply Ygg2 2 days ago Some is doing heavy misrepresentation.Latest batch of LLM's Linux had 423 vulnerabilities. Out of which 10 were Rust*. Would you prefer more or less CVEs?But it's like seat belt analogy. It's a helper not a panacea.* Granted Rust isn't in the entire kernel yet. D inigyou 1 day ago That sounds like Linux has more vulnerabilities per line of Rust code than line of C code, given the language ratio... Ygg2 1 day ago Sure, but C code is way older so most of the bugs there should have been excised by now...
Ygg2 2 days ago Some is doing heavy misrepresentation.Latest batch of LLM's Linux had 423 vulnerabilities. Out of which 10 were Rust*. Would you prefer more or less CVEs?But it's like seat belt analogy. It's a helper not a panacea.* Granted Rust isn't in the entire kernel yet. D inigyou 1 day ago That sounds like Linux has more vulnerabilities per line of Rust code than line of C code, given the language ratio... Ygg2 1 day ago Sure, but C code is way older so most of the bugs there should have been excised by now...
inigyou 1 day ago That sounds like Linux has more vulnerabilities per line of Rust code than line of C code, given the language ratio... Ygg2 1 day ago Sure, but C code is way older so most of the bugs there should have been excised by now...
Ygg2 1 day ago Sure, but C code is way older so most of the bugs there should have been excised by now...
Some is doing heavy misrepresentation.
Latest batch of LLM's Linux had 423 vulnerabilities. Out of which 10 were Rust*. Would you prefer more or less CVEs?
But it's like seat belt analogy. It's a helper not a panacea.
* Granted Rust isn't in the entire kernel yet. D
That sounds like Linux has more vulnerabilities per line of Rust code than line of C code, given the language ratio...
Sure, but C code is way older so most of the bugs there should have been excised by now...