Comment by ColdStream
1 day ago
Sounds like a good plan to me.
Probably a dozen reasons why we cannot that I am unaware of, but from my arm chair it looks good.
1 day ago
Sounds like a good plan to me.
Probably a dozen reasons why we cannot that I am unaware of, but from my arm chair it looks good.
The water was likely redirected for agricultural purposes and the farmers won't/can't surrender it on top of drought, if it's anything like the US. Would be real cool if we could make investments like this though.
In this case no, all the water is drained. I don't think meaningful amounts are retained for agriculture.
The pine forest is the agriculture.
1 reply →
This is another point that is overlooked. If you transform a landscape, moving the water through quickly or whatever, preventing the natural action (eg deeply drenching the ground) perhaps you create a high risk of a fire where the ground gets very hot, where that wasn't a possibility before.
Looking at what this group is slowly doing all over the world I don't think it is impossible tough but possible. https://www.youtube.com/@MossyEarth
Let it burn then?
People live there. So do animals and insects. Never mind the air pollution.
And later, different animals and insects will live there.
4 replies →
Jail the arsonists is much better