Comment by SubiculumCode 17 hours ago How about, is there reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred? 5 comments SubiculumCode Reply ytoawwhra92 16 hours ago Not required at an airport, for whatever reason. bubblethink 14 hours ago The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in. ytoawwhra92 10 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device. 3form 14 hours ago I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you. inigyou 16 hours ago The reason is anti-immigration
ytoawwhra92 16 hours ago Not required at an airport, for whatever reason. bubblethink 14 hours ago The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in. ytoawwhra92 10 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device. 3form 14 hours ago I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you. inigyou 16 hours ago The reason is anti-immigration
bubblethink 14 hours ago The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in. ytoawwhra92 10 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
ytoawwhra92 10 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
3form 14 hours ago I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you.
Not required at an airport, for whatever reason.
The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in.
Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...
And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you.
The reason is anti-immigration