Comment by ytoawwhra92 15 hours ago Not required at an airport, for whatever reason. 4 comments ytoawwhra92 Reply bubblethink 12 hours ago The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in. ytoawwhra92 8 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device. 3form 13 hours ago I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you. inigyou 14 hours ago The reason is anti-immigration
bubblethink 12 hours ago The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in. ytoawwhra92 8 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
ytoawwhra92 8 hours ago Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
3form 13 hours ago I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you.
The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in.
Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-...
And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.
I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you.
The reason is anti-immigration